About half of the experts who responded to the campaign said that people's use of technology would significantly reduce key aspects of democracy and democracy, but even those who expressed optimism often expressed concern. This section includes comments on issues raised by all respondents without regard to their response to the big question about the impact of technology on democracy by 2030. These troubles are grouped under seven themes.
Empowering the powerful: Corporate and government agendas often do not achieve the goals of democracy or achieve the results of democracy. They serve the interests of those in authority
Internet developer and developer and technology director predicted, “I expect that by 2030, about 75% of the world's population will be enslaved by intelligence-based surveillance systems developed in China and exported worldwide. These systems will keep all citizens under supervision 24 hours a day, seven days a week, monitoring everything we do. ”
Dan Gillmor, founder of News Co / Lab at Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University, and a professor of digital media literacy commented, , and what the legal equivalent of an unanswered black box algorithm, more than anything Orwell imagined. But this can only happen in a society that can not suffer to defend freedom - or be easily led / trampled on - and that is happening in most Western democracies. The re-emergence of social racism has nothing to do with technology, other than the extent to which adults use it to promote their own evil goals. Meanwhile, institutions that should be defending freedom - journalism among themselves - are largely failing to do so. In a few places, people have urged leaders to back off, as part of a ban on the use of facial recognition in San Francisco. But the intervention is amazing and fast. ”